Chapter[ X. Review of the Major League Baseball Joint Drug Prevention and
Treatment Program ]
Section[ B. 1. Independence ]
1. Independence
Major League Baseball’s joint program was revised in 2006 to create the position
of independent program administrator. This reform was a significant positive step, but the
program still falls short of true independence.
Before the 2006 revisions, a committee composed of two representatives each
from the Commissioner’s Office and the Players Association, including one physician appointed
by each party, was responsible for overseeing and administering the joint program. At all
relevant times, the members of this Health Policy Advisory Committee (“HPAC”) were Rob
Manfred and Dr. Larry Westreich on behalf of the Commissioner’s Office, and Gene Orza and
Dr. Joel Solomon on behalf of the Players Association.521 The drug testing programs in other
professional sports leagues, including the NFL, the NBA, and the NHL, also are jointly
controlled by the leagues and their respective players associations.
Under the 2006 revisions, certain HPAC responsibilities were delegated to a
newly created position of program administrator, including overseeing testing, collection, and
521 A fifth member can be appointed by these four members in the event that they are
unable to reach a majority decision. The four-member HPAC always has reached agreement,
however, and a fifth member never has been appointed.
263
analysis procedures, and program operational review. In April 2006, Dr. Bryan Wesley Smith,
a physician trained in sports medicine who also serves as consultant to the Atlantic Coast
Conference, was appointed as the program administrator.
The program administrator may be removed by the Commissioner’s Office or the
Players Association, or either of them, at any time for any reason.522 In addition, the
Commissioner’s Office and the Players Association have retained exclusive authority over the
most important aspects of the joint program, including: (1) the number of tests administered
(both in-season and during the off-season); (2) the determination of what substances are
prohibited; (3) the selection and retention of the entities responsible for the collection and testing
of the samples; (4) determinations to order “reasonable cause” testing; and (5) investigating and
determining whether a test is considered positive under the joint program.523
The Commissioner’s Office and the Players Association also retain control over
some aspects of the collection process. In those areas in which he does not completely control
the collection process, however, Dr. Smith, the independent program administrator, advised us
that he can make recommendations to improve the joint program and that none of the several
recommendations that he has made has been rejected by the Commissioner’s Office and the
Players Association.
522 Major League Baseball’s Joint Drug Prevention and Treatment Program § 1(B)(1)
(2006).
523 See generally Major League Baseball’s Joint Drug Prevention and Treatment Program
(2006). A test that is labeled positive by the testing laboratory might still be considered not to be
positive under the joint program for a number of reasons, among them therapeutic use
exemptions, chain of custody issues, allegations that a positive test was the result of adulterated
supplements, and variations between A and B samples.
264