Chapter[ XI. Recommendations ]
Section[ A. 4. All Clubs Should Have Clear, Written, and Well-Publicized Policies for Reporting Information Relating to Possible Performance Enhancing Substance Violations ]
4. All Clubs Should Have Clear, Written, and Well-Publicized Policies for Reporting Information Relating to Possible Performance Enhancing Substance Violations
Since 1991, Major League Baseball’s Drug Policy has covered performance
enhancing substances expressly. That policy states in part:
If any club covers up or fails to disclose to [the Commissioner’s] office
any information concerning drug use by a player, the Club will be fined in
292
an amount up to $2 million, the highest allowable amount under the Major
League Constitution.571
Many club personnel told us that they were not aware of the policy. The
Commissioner’s Office should actively publicize its policy regarding performance enhancing
substances to club personnel and require each club to adopt a uniform, written policy for
reporting information about possible substance violations. The club policy should state that any
information concerning a player’s possible use, possession, or distribution of performance
enhancing substances must be reported to a designated club contact immediately. The club
contact, in turn, should be required to promptly report all such information to the Department of
Investigations.
At least one exception to this reporting requirement should be included in the club
policy. Physicians and club athletic trainers should not be required to report such information if
to do so would cause them to violate federal or state law relating to the confidentiality of patient
communications or information.572
To ensure that the clubs are meeting their long-standing obligations to report all
information concerning possible possession or use, the Commissioner’s Office should require all
club personnel with responsibility affecting baseball operations to sign annual certifications.
These certifications should affirm that the club employee has no undisclosed, actual knowledge
of any possible possession or use of performance enhancing substances by any current major
league player. This certification should provide an exception for athletic trainers, to the extent
571 See Memorandum from Commissioner Selig to All Clubs Re: Baseball’s Drug Policy
and Prevention Program, dated Mar. 2, 2005, at 2. The amount of the fine has varied over time.
572 At the same time, the Commissioner’s Office should revise its substance policy to
exempt clubs from sanctions for failure to provide other reportable information where the
disclosure of such information by a physician or athletic trainer would violate the law.
293
that they are in receipt of responsive information the disclosure of which would violate the law
or the rules of applicable licensing organizations.573
In the event of a failure to certify, or should the Commissioner’s Office determine
that a certification was false, the Commissioner should exercise his discretion under the “best
interests of the game” clause to impose discipline appropriate to the circumstances.