Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Volume  Volume2\Physical Geography

Entry#  987. That marine shells could not go up the mountains.


 Contents: Vol. 1  |  Vol. 2

 

That marine shells could not go up the mountains.


OF THE DELUGE AND OF MARINE SHELLS.


If you were to say that the shells which are to be seen within the

confines of Italy now, in our days, far from the sea and at such

heights, had been brought there by the deluge which left them there,

I should answer that if you believe that this deluge rose 7 cubits

above the highest mountains-- as he who measured it has

written--these shells, which always live near the sea-shore, should

have been left on the mountains; and not such a little way from the

foot of the mountains; nor all at one level, nor in layers upon

layers. And if you were to say that these shells are desirous of

remaining near to the margin of the sea, and that, as it rose in

height, the shells quitted their first home, and followed the

increase of the waters up to their highest level; to this I answer,

that the cockle is an animal of not more rapid movement than the

snail is out of water, or even somewhat slower; because it does not

swim, on the contrary it makes a furrow in the sand by means of its

sides, and in this furrow it will travel each day from 3 to 4

braccia; therefore this creature, with so slow a motion, could not

have travelled from the Adriatic sea as far as Monferrato in

Lombardy Footnote: _Monferrato di Lombardia_. The range of hills of

Monferrato is in Piedmont, and Casale di Monferrato belonged, in

Leonardo's time, to the Marchese di Mantova. , which is 250 miles

distance, in 40 days; which he has said who took account of the

time. And if you say that the waves carried them there, by their

gravity they could not move, excepting at the bottom. And if you

will not grant me this, confess at least that they would have to

stay at the summits of the highest mountains, in the lakes which are

enclosed among the mountains, like the lakes of Lario, or of Como

and il Maggiore Footnote: _Lago di Lario._ Lacus Larius was the

name given by the Romans to the lake of Como. It is evident that it

is here a slip of the pen since the the words in the MS. are: _"Come

Lago di Lario o'l Magare e di Como,"_ In the MS. after line 16 we

come upon a digression treating of the weight of water; this has

here been omitted. It is 11 lines long.  and of Fiesole, and of

Perugia, and others.


And if you should say that the shells were carried by the waves,

being empty and dead, I say that where the dead went they were not

far removed from the living; for in these mountains living ones are

found, which are recognisable by the shells being in pairs; and they

are in a layer where there are no dead ones; and a little higher up

they are found, where they were thrown by the waves, all the dead

ones with their shells separated, near to where the rivers fell into

the sea, to a great depth; like the Arno which fell from the

Gonfolina near to Monte Lupo Footnote: _Monte Lupo_, compare 970,

13; it is between Empoli and Florence. , where it left a deposit of

gravel which may still be seen, and which has agglomerated; and of

stones of various districts, natures, and colours and hardness,

making one single conglomerate. And a little beyond the sandstone

conglomerate a tufa has been formed, where it turned towards Castel

Florentino; farther on, the mud was deposited in which the shells

lived, and which rose in layers according to the levels at which the

turbid Arno flowed into that sea. And from time to time the bottom

of the sea was raised, depositing these shells in layers, as may be

seen in the cutting at Colle Gonzoli, laid open by the Arno which is

wearing away the base of it; in which cutting the said layers of

shells are very plainly to be seen in clay of a bluish colour, and

various marine objects are found there. And if the earth of our

hemisphere is indeed raised by so much higher than it used to be, it

must have become by so much lighter by the waters which it lost

through the rift between Gibraltar and Ceuta; and all the more the

higher it rose, because the weight of the waters which were thus

lost would be added to the earth in the other hemisphere. And if the

shells had been carried by the muddy deluge they would have been

mixed up, and separated from each other amidst the mud, and not in

regular steps and layers-- as we see them now in our time.

Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Seaside Software Inc. DBA askSam Systems, P.O. Box 1428, Perry FL 32348
Telephone: 800-800-1997 / 850-584-6590   •   Email: info@askSam.com   •   Support: http://www.askSam.com/forums
© Copyright 1985-2011   •   Privacy Statement