Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Volume  Volume1\The Practice Of Painting

Entry#  655.


 Contents: Vol. 1  |  Vol. 2

 

Painting is superior to sculpture (655. 656).


THAT SCULPTURE IS LESS INTELLECTUAL THAN PAINTING, AND LACKS MANY

CHARACTERISTICS OF NATURE.


I myself, having exercised myself no less in sculpture than in

painting and doing both one and the other in the same degree, it

seems to me that I can, without invidiousness, pronounce an opinion

as to which of the two is of the greatest merit and difficulty and

perfection. In the first place sculpture requires a certain light,

that is from above, a picture carries everywhere with it its own

light and shade. Thus sculpture owes its importance to light and

shade, and the sculptor is aided in this by the nature, of the

relief which is inherent in it, while the painter whose art

expresses the accidental aspects of nature, places his effects in

the spots where nature must necessarily produce them. The sculptor

cannot diversify his work by the various natural colours of objects;

painting is not defective in any particular. The sculptor when he

uses perspective cannot make it in any way appear true; that of the

painter can appear like a hundred miles beyond the picture itself.

Their works have no aerial perspective whatever, they cannot

represent transparent bodies, they cannot represent luminous bodies,

nor reflected lights, nor lustrous bodies--as mirrors and the like

polished surfaces, nor mists, nor dark skies, nor an infinite number

of things which need not be told for fear of tedium. As regards the

power of resisting time, though they have this resistance Footnote

19: From what is here said as to painting on copper it is very

evident that Leonardo was not acquainted with the method of painting

in oil on thin copper plates, introduced by the Flemish painters of

the XVIIth century. J. LERMOLIEFF has already pointed out that in

the various collections containing pictures by the great masters of

the Italian Renaissance, those painted on copper (for instance the

famous reading Magdalen in the Dresden Gallery) are the works of a

much later date (see _Zeitschrift fur bildende Kunst_. Vol. X pg.

333, and: _Werke italienischer Master in den Galerien von Munchen,

Dresden und Berlin_. Leipzig 1880, pg. 158 and 159.)--Compare No.

654, 29. , a picture painted on thick copper covered with white

enamel on which it is painted with enamel colours and then put into

the fire again and baked, far exceeds sculpture in permanence. It

may be said that if a mistake is made it is not easy to remedy it;

it is but a poor argument to try to prove that a work be the nobler

because oversights are irremediable; I should rather say that it

will be more difficult to improve the mind of the master who makes

such mistakes than to repair the work he has spoilt.


Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Seaside Software Inc. DBA askSam Systems, P.O. Box 1428, Perry FL 32348
Telephone: 800-800-1997 / 850-584-6590   •   Email: info@askSam.com   •   Support: http://www.askSam.com/forums
© Copyright 1985-2011   •   Privacy Statement