Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Title[ Part 2: The First Pillar - Minimum Capital Requirements

Section[ 2. Operational requirements for use of external credit assessments



565.     The following operational criteria concerning the use of external credit assessments apply in the standardised and IRB approaches of the securitisation framework:


(a)        To be eligible for risk-weighting purposes, the external credit assessment must take into account and reflect the entire amount of credit risk exposure the bank has with regard to all payments owed to it. For example, if a bank is owed both principal and interest, the assessment must fully take into account and reflect the credit risk associated with timely repayment of both principal and interest.


(b)        The external credit assessments must be from an eligible ECAI as recognised by the bank’s  national  supervisor in accordance  with paragraphs 90  to  108 with the following exception. In contrast with bullet three of paragraph 91, an eligible credit assessment must be publicly available. In other words, a rating must be published in an accessible form and included in the ECAI’s transition matrix.  Consequently, ratings that are made available only to the parties to a transaction do not satisfy this requirement.


(c)        Eligible ECAIs must have a demonstrated expertise in  assessing securitisations, which may be evidenced by strong market acceptance.


(d)        A bank must apply external credit assessments from eligible ECAIs consistently across a given type of securitisation exposure. Furthermore, a bank cannot use the credit assessments issued by one  ECAI for one or more tranches and those  of another ECAI for other positions (whether retained or purchased) within the same securitisation structure that may or may not be rated by the first ECAI. Where two or more eligible ECAIs can be used and these assess the  credit risk of the same securitisation exposure differently, paragraphs 96 to 98 will apply.


(e)        Where CRM is provided directly  to  an SPE  by an eligible guarantor defined  in paragraph 195 and is  reflected in the external credit assessment assigned to  a securitisation  exposure(s),  the  risk  weight  associated  with  that  external  credit assessment should be used. In order to avoid  any double  counting, no additional capital recognition is permitted. If the CRM provider is not recognised as an eligible guarantor in paragraph 195, the covered securitisation exposures should be treated as unrated.


(f)         In the situation where a credit risk mitigant is not obtained by the SPE but rather applied to a specific securitisation exposure  within a given structure (e.g. ABS tranche), the bank must treat the exposure as if it is unrated and then use the CRM treatment outlined in Section II.D or in the foundation IRB approach of Section III, to recognise the hedge.


Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Seaside Software Inc. DBA askSam Systems, P.O. Box 1428, Perry FL 32348
Telephone: 800-800-1997 / 850-584-6590   •   Email: info@askSam.com   •   Support: http://www.askSam.com/forums
© Copyright 1985-2011   •   Privacy Statement