Contents    Prev    Next    Last



Title[ Part 2: The First Pillar - Minimum Capital Requirements

Section[ 2. Risk components



(i)         Probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD)


331.     For each  identified pool of retail exposures, banks are expected to  provide an estimate of the PD and LGD associated with the pool, subject to the minimum requirements as set out in Section III.H. Additionally, the PD for retail exposures is the greater of the one- year PD associated with the internal borrower grade to which the pool of retail exposures is assigned or 0.03%.



(ii)        Recognition of guarantees and credit derivatives


332.     Banks may reflect the risk-reducing effects  of guarantees and credit derivatives, either in support of an individual obligation or a pool of exposures, through an adjustment of either the PD or LGD estimate, subject to the minimum requirements in paragraphs 480 to

489. Whether adjustments are done through PD or LGD, they must be done in a consistent manner for a given guarantee or credit derivative type.


333.     Consistent with the requirements outlined above for corporate, sovereign, and bank exposures, banks must not include the effect  of double default in such adjustments. The adjusted risk weight must not be less than that of a comparable direct exposure to the protection provider. Consistent with the standardised approach, banks may choose not to recognise credit protection if doing so would result in a higher capital requirement.



(iii)       Exposure at default (EAD)


334.     Both on and off-balance sheet retail exposures are measured gross of specific provisions or partial write-offs. The EAD on drawn amounts should not be less than the sum of (i) the amount by which a bank’s regulatory capital would be reduced if the exposure were written-off fully, and (ii) any specific provisions and partial write-offs.  When the difference between the instrument’s EAD and the sum of (i) and (ii) is positive, this amount is termed a discount. The calculation of risk-weighted assets is independent of any discounts. Under the limited  circumstances  described  in  paragraph  380,  discounts  may  be  included  in  the measurement of total eligible provisions for purposes of the EL-provision calculation set out in Section III.G.


335.     On-balance  sheet  netting  of  loans  and  deposits  of  a  bank  to  or  from  a  retail customer will be permitted subject to the same conditions outlined in paragraph 188 of the standardised  approach.  For  retail  off-balance  sheet  items,  banks  must  use  their  own estimates of CCFs provided the minimum requirements in paragraphs 474 to 477 and 479 are satisfied.


336.     For retail exposures with uncertain future drawdown such as  credit  cards, banks must take into account their history and/or expectation of additional drawings prior to default in their overall calibration of loss  estimates. In particular, where a bank does not reflect conversion factors for undrawn lines in its EAD estimates, it must reflect in its LGD estimates the  likelihood  of  additional  drawings  prior  to  default.  Conversely,  if  the  bank  does  not incorporate  the possibility of additional drawings in its LGD estimates, it must do so in its EAD estimates.


337.     When only the drawn balances of retail facilities have been securitised, banks must ensure that they continue to hold required capital against their share (i.e. seller’s interest) of undrawn balances related to the securitised exposures using the IRB approach to credit risk. This means that for  such facilities, banks must reflect  the impact of  CCFs in their EAD estimates rather than  in the LGD  estimates.  For determining the EAD associated with the seller’s interest in the undrawn lines, the undrawn balances of securitised exposures would be allocated between the seller’s and investors’ interests on a pro rata basis, based on the proportions  of the seller’s and investors’  shares of the  securitised drawn balances. The investors’ share of undrawn balances related to the securitised exposures is subject to the treatment in paragraph 643.


338.     To the extent that foreign exchange and interest rate commitments exist within a bank’s retail portfolio for IRB purposes, banks  are not permitted to provide their internal assessments of credit equivalent amounts. Instead, the rules for the standardised approach continue to apply.




Contents    Prev    Next    Last


Seaside Software Inc. DBA askSam Systems, P.O. Box 1428, Perry FL 32348
Telephone: 800-800-1997 / 850-584-6590   •   Email: info@askSam.com   •   Support: http://www.askSam.com/forums
© Copyright 1985-2011   •   Privacy Statement